Rereading what I wrote and posted on this blog about the Ministry of Culture, UNAR and Tiwanaku, in the last 5 years, I see that after numerous personnel changes the Directorate General of Heritage, the National Archaeological Unit and the Municipal Government of Tiwanaku, processes carried out ex-civil servants, white massacres implemented, co-opted leaders and technical staff castling executed between the Municipal Government of Tiwanaku and the Ministry of Culture , remains the same inefficiency and negligence in treating problems key assets, both in the archaeological site of Tiwanaku as in other major archaeological institutions in the country.
a wrong, and often convenenciera reading of the Constitution of the State, the Runtime Framework Law and other regulations pertaining to the archaeological heritage on the part of some national cultures, has resulted in a total vacuum state authority and responsibility, in which the primary responsibility on the issue and archaeological heritage are paralyzed by the effect of its own shares and dependent on the will and desire to prosecutors and lawyers (inside and outside the Ministry of Culture and GMT) to meet with responsibilities and obligations to society, the Law and the Government itself has commissioned them.
unfortunate thing is that they are hardly irrelevant nuances that differentiate the speeches of successive discharge responsible for the UNAR, UAM (or whatever it is called) to explain the failure to do anything to protect and safeguard the archaeological heritage of Tiwanaku .
The restructuring mented culture that seems to never arrive, do not go through a simple reshuffling of posts from current and former officials, whose inefficiency, ineffectiveness and incompetence has already been tested.
Change title, status, logo, t-shirt or banner is not Mrs. Yugar restructuring and Company!
Beyond errors to differentiate between mold and lichen by the journalist who wrote the note, is painful the explanation given our authorities regarding the situation of Tiwanaku in the note referred to below: See more at: http://www.la-razon.com/version.php?ArticleId=125427&EditionId=2438
Carlos Lemuz http://arqueobolivia.blogspot.com 
0 comments:
Post a Comment