A review committee comprised of officials from the Ministry of Culture, the Cultural Foundation SIARB and the Central Bank of Bolivia were rejected after trying nstalling an assessment mission in museums Tiwanaku stone and ceramic. The event was preceded by a demagogic delivery overall site management to local authorities and the public declaration of a series of actions that the commission was made in the town of Tiwanaku since 26 March this. Apparently these actions had not been cleared by public authorities and community in the region, which is why the communal and municipal authorities rejected Tiwanaku, sending it first and then joining fee to the museum grounds.
The public rating of "cowardly" the Director of Cultural Affairs City of Tiwanaku by any members of the commission does not do more for the deteriorating relationship for several years held the Ministry of Culture with the authorities of Tiwanaku. Unfortunately
current staff of the Heritage does not take into account the lessons learned through the relationship with the city of Tiwanaku (something paradoxical in Archaeology), or properly collected local demands and to develop a smart strategy for action be efficiently and effectively. On the contrary, it tries to impose actions on a commission formed - arbitrarily and unilaterally by the Ministry of Culture - by institutions that have little to do with the problem raised Tiwanaku.
is worth remembering that the technical responsibility of this archaeological site is unique to the Ministry of Culture and second order of the Municipal Government of Tiwanaku
We must also remember that the current authorities of the Directorate of Heritage in the past have played roles unfortunate for the archaeological site, which is part of the distrust that local authorities have regard to the performance which is likely to solve the problem.
Salguero Minister faces this way an initial disruption from this point that significantly affect their public image and bare its shortcomings in the management of cultural policies about heritage archaeological and cultural development. The questions are: Why does every time you change an authority all the issues they face from scratch? The Ministry of Culture is an instance in which ministers and technical novice and inexperienced (in governance) should commence first weapons? Why continue to act with the method of trial and error "or the painful" killing you learn?.
Newspaper articles: http://www.fmbolivia.tv/2011/03/en-tiwanaku-se-inicia-la-conservacion-del-patrimonio/
http://www .laprensa.com.bo/noticias/27-3-2011/noticias/27-03-2011_13703.php
0 comments:
Post a Comment